At the COP30 climate summit in Belém, Brazil, a new draft deal has stirred controversy by omitting any plan to phase out fossil fuels. Earlier versions had included a “roadmap” showing how countries could reduce dependence on coal, oil, and gas, but the latest text removed all such references.
Over 80 countries had pushed for a clear fossil fuel phase-out, citing its importance in meeting global climate targets. However, oil-producing nations argued that a phase-out could harm their economies, leading to a standoff in negotiations.
The European Union criticized the draft as too weak, insisting that a commitment to reduce fossil fuel use must be included. Meanwhile, a major issue remains financing climate adaptation. The draft proposes tripling funds for poorer nations by 2030, but details on who will provide the money, governments, banks, or private institutions, remain unclear.
Adding to the challenges, a fire broke out at the conference venue, forcing evacuations and delaying talks. Despite these disruptions, summit organizers urge countries to find common ground before the conference concludes.
Experts warn that leaving fossil fuels unaddressed could undermine global efforts to curb climate change. As one COP30 official noted, “Without a roadmap for phasing out oil, gas, and coal, the world risks falling short of the targets agreed in previous climate accords.”
The COP30 summit now faces pressure to reconcile the economic interests of oil-producing nations with the urgent need for climate action, while securing financial support for vulnerable countries. The outcome of these talks could shape global climate policy for years to come.
