The United States carried out a military operation in Venezuela, capturing President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, and transporting them to New York to face federal charges. Maduro is set to appear in a Manhattan court on drug trafficking and narco‑terrorism charges, marking an unprecedented legal and diplomatic moment.
President Trump described the operation, code‑named Operation Absolute Resolve, as a success, targeting criminal networks. He also indicated that the United States would temporarily influence Venezuela’s transition, including oversight of its oil resources, while clarifying that Washington does not intend to govern daily affairs.
The operation involved elite US forces and extensive planning, prompting immediate international criticism. Venezuela’s government denounced the action as a “kidnapping” and violation of sovereignty, while officials emphasized that the country seeks peace and hopes for “respectful relations” with the US despite tensions.
Global reactions varied sharply. Russia, China, and many Latin American nations condemned the U.S. action as illegal under international law. Cuba reported casualties among its personnel in the raid, while Israel praised the US for decisive action.
In the US, the operation has triggered intense debate. Critics argue it exceeded presidential authority without Congressional approval, while supporters say it was necessary to confront transnational crime and drug trafficking.
As Maduro prepares to appear in court, the situation raises complex questions about international law, state sovereignty, and the geopolitical consequences of a military intervention targeting a sitting head of state. The world is watching closely as diplomatic and legal developments continue to unfold.
Also Read: Venezuela crisis pushes rupee past 90
