United States President Donald Trump said on Monday that ending the ongoing conflict involving Iran will be a “mutual decision” made together with Benjamin Netanyahu and highlighted close coordination between Washington and Jerusalem on strategy and timing.
In comments made during an interview with Times of Israel, Trump stressed that the United States and Israel are aligned in their goals and will work together to determine when and how the conflict should conclude. The president’s remarks come amid heightened tensions and military engagements in the Middle East, triggered by a deadly strike that killed Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, earlier this year.
“This will be a mutual decision with Prime Minister Netanyahu on when this fight is over,” Trump said, emphasising that both nations are cooperating closely. He added that the United States wants a “decisive outcome” and is committed to preventing Iran from posing future threats. Trump noted that timing and conditions on the ground will influence when operations wind down, and that the strategy is being discussed in daily consultations with Israeli leadership.
Trump repeated that the US is not just acting unilaterally, underlining that any decision to end the conflict will be taken jointly with Israel. He framed the approach as part of a broader effort to ensure long‑term regional stability while addressing security concerns. Trump also hinted that diplomatic communication remains open with allies and partners to align on next steps.
The president’s comments come as global markets remain volatile due to uncertainty surrounding the conflict. Crude oil prices have climbed sharply as hostilities affect supply routes and investor confidence. Many nations, including major oil importers, are watching developments closely, concerned about economic fallout from prolonged instability.
Trump’s emphasis on joint decision‑making with Netanyahu aims to reassure both domestic and international audiences that the US‑Israel alliance is strong and unified in its objectives. However, critics argue that prolonged conflict could have wider geopolitical and humanitarian consequences, urging greater emphasis on diplomatic solutions.
Also Read: Trump says oil price spike is “small price to pay”
