A large Venezuelan oil tanker was seized off the country’s coast by US authorities in a high-profile maritime operation, sharply escalating tensions between Caracas and Washington. President Donald Trump announced the action, calling it one of the largest vessel seizures ever carried out, though he did not provide full details on the reasoning.
The tanker was intercepted during a coordinated mission involving the US Coast Guard and other federal forces. Video footage showed personnel fast‑roping from helicopters onto the ship’s deck, taking control quickly and efficiently. U.S. officials stated that the vessel had been under sanctions for years and was allegedly part of a network transporting crude from Venezuela and Iran in violation of US and international regulations. The ship had recently departed a Venezuelan port carrying heavy crude, reportedly with part of the cargo destined for Cuba.
Venezuelan officials condemned the action, describing it as “international piracy” and “blatant theft” of national resources. The government called the seizure a violation of sovereignty and announced plans to raise the issue with international legal authorities. Caracas accused the United States of using military and economic measures to destabilize the Maduro administration.
The news immediately affected global energy markets, with Brent crude prices rising amid concerns over potential disruptions to Venezuelan oil flows. Analysts warned that further maritime enforcement actions could add to volatility in oil markets if tensions escalate.
The seizure comes because of broader US pressure on the Maduro government, which has faced accusations of corruption, election irregularities, and links to illicit trafficking networks. In recent months, their military presence in the Caribbean has increased, and several vessels allegedly involved in illegal oil and drug transport have been intercepted.
The operation reflects US efforts to limit the Venezuelan government’s access to oil revenues, which are critical to sustaining its administration. While supporters argue such actions pressure political reform, critics question the legality of maritime seizures and highlight the potential humanitarian and geopolitical consequences, particularly in a country already facing economic hardship.
